LambdaTest

We can access too many browsers at a time and integration is easy (for paid users).

Minimum duration for free users. one browser can only usable at a time.

I need to install all types of browsers if lamdatest application is not available.

Extensive browser and device coverage Ease of implementation & use Real-time testing and debugging tools Strong customer support Supports automation frameworks (e.g., Selenium, Cypress) Collaboration-friendly with integrations (e.g., Slack, Jira) Geo-location testing and Smart Visual Testing User-friendly interface

Occasional performance lag Limited features on free plan Test execution speed could improve Pricing may be high for smaller teams Frequency of Use may be limited for smaller projects

Problems LambdaTest Solves: Cross-browser compatibility issues Device and OS fragmentation Real-time debugging challenges Integration with CI/CD pipelines for continuous testing Visual UI inconsistencies Need for collaboration and bug tracking across teams Location-based testing for regional requirements Benefits: Ensures consistent user experience across platforms Speeds up testing with access to many device/OS configurations Simplifies debugging with live testing tools Streamlines automated testing in CI/CD workflows Improves UI accuracy with visual testing tools Enhances team collaboration with integration options Allows location-based testing to validate regional content

The best thing i must say about the lambda test is the cross browser and cross device testing at the same place with multiple device.

I won't say demerit but if they like increase the timing per device to like 10 minutes that would be really effective for any kind of testing.

The best thing about LambdaTest is that it gives you access to all kinds of devices in one place. As a developer, that’s a huge help, you can catch the same bugs you’d see on real devices without needing to physically own that device. It really takes the stress out of dealing with cross-device issues and makes the whole testing process so much smoother. Honestly, it's one of those tools that just makes your life easier.

LambdaTest is very robust, but is a great tool for cross-browser tests.

LambdaTest can be confusing at times because it has so many features/functionality.

Cross-browser testing.

Best for unit testing as I am a Associate Software Developer

A free version should be available to use

Lambda gives me a second perspective

The most useful thing is being able to test on different browsers and operating systems without having to set up multiple environments. You save a lot of time on configurations. It is also practical for checking specific errors on devices you don't physically have. The interface is simple to use.

Sometimes remote sessions are slow or have some delay, which makes debugging more difficult. I've also had problems with loading certain heavy sites. And the prices are not the most affordable if you need to work with several testers or many parallel tests.

Primarily, it helps us validate the compatibility of our web applications across multiple browsers and operating systems without having to maintain a farm of devices or virtual machines. This reduces testing time, improves QA coverage, and allows us to detect errors that would normally go unnoticed. Additionally, it facilitates integration with CI/CD pipelines.

LambdaTest has been a game-changer for our QA workflow. I use it primarily for cross-browser and responsive testing, and the range of browsers and devices is impressive. The UI is clean, and it doesn’t take long to spin up a new test environment. The integrations with tools like Jira and GitHub make reporting bugs seamless.

At times, live testing sessions can experience slight lag depending on the browser-device combo, though it’s infrequent. I'd also love to see more advanced debugging tools integrated directly into the platform.

Before using LambdaTest, testing across multiple browsers and OS combinations was time-consuming and inconsistent. Now, we’re able to test faster and catch layout or functionality issues early, which improves the quality of our releases and saves developer time.

I’ve been using LambdaTest for a while, and I’m incredibly impressed with how it simplifies cross-browser testing.

The speed and reliability are top-notch, and the integrations with my workflow (like Jira and Slack) have been a game-changer. Support has been prompt and helpful whenever I’ve needed assistance.

LambdaTest is a must-have tool for any development team aiming for top-quality web experiences. Highly recommend!

The cross-browser testing capabilities are excellent. I can quickly test our websites across different browsers and devices without maintaining multiple local setups. It is easy to use, even to no technical people.

It is too slow when I need to test different browsers and operating systems and I need to switch between them. Sometimes there are some problems, for example I wanted to test MacOS but I could only see log-in page.

Testing websites on different browsers and operating systems.

I like that i get the real experience, what errors my users are getting on different devices. It made it easy for us to see and improve those errors. the integration to connect my localhost to their environment is a good feature and it is bit easy too just install a plugin and done. The team is helpful, i got connected with the team as soon as i registered.

The devices are very fast as they are not being used as normal devices like running 10 apps in the background, so there are few errors which are not visible on lambda test's devices it is still there on normal devices.

I get the real experience, what errors my users are getting on different devices. It made it easy for us to see and improve those errors.